Live support chatSeismic Design: Past, Present and Future (Ohio T&M)
Credit: 2 PDH
Subject Matter Expert: Farah Labib Eldib, S.E., M.Sc.
In Seismic Design: Past, Present and Future, you'll learn ...
- The background and progression of structural seismic concepts
- The relative merits of the eight basic steel-frame designs that have been used in multi-story buildings
- The evolution of concrete building frameworks
- The use of building configurations and contemporary high-performance seismic mechanisms for energy dissipation
Overview
To meet the Ohio Board's intent that online courses be "paced" by the provider, a timer will be used to record your study time. You will be unable to access the quiz until the required study time of 100 minutes has been met.
Credit: 2 PDH
Length: 49 pages
Design of any building is a challenge for architects and engineers, and the challenge is made more complex when there is a need to provide for earthquake resistance.
During the past 100 years, seismic design philosophy and details have progressed from simply considering earthquakes to be the same as wind loads, to a sophisticated understanding of the phenomenon of the earthshaking that induces a building response.
This course covers the 100-year history of seismic structural systems, ranging from simple to sophisticated solutions. Basic structural behavior is outlined; guidance for selecting a good structural system is suggested, and relevant seismic issues are explored.
Specific Knowledge or Skill Obtained
This course teaches the following specific knowledge and skills:
- A summary of 100 years of structural seismic design
- Current and historical structural seismic systems, ranging from pre-1906 San Francisco earthquake to present day
- Three main factors that have impacted the progression of seismic systems selected by structural engineers
- The many variables that make it difficult to select an appropriate seismic system
- Why the simple building code approach to seismic design is often inadequate
- Why lateral drift that is too large or too small results in seismic performance issues
- “Pushover” performance comparisons of six different structural systems for a 4-story building
- Why energy dissipation is an important factor in a building’s overall seismic performance
- Energy dissipating concepts developed in 1976 at the New Zealand National Laboratory
- Seismic performance characteristics, including non-linear drift, energy dissipation and cyclic behavior, for twenty different structural systems
- Why building configuration is frequently the governing factor in the ultimate seismic behavior of a particular structure
Certificate of Completion
You will be able to immediately print a certificate of completion after passing a multiple-choice quiz consisting of 10 questions. PDH credits are not awarded until the course is completed and quiz is passed.
| This course is applicable to professional engineers in: | ||
| Alabama (P.E.) | Alaska (P.E.) | Arkansas (P.E.) |
| Delaware (P.E.) | District of Columbia (P.E.) | Florida (P.E. Area of Practice) |
| Georgia (P.E.) | Idaho (P.E.) | Illinois (P.E.) |
| Illinois (S.E.) | Indiana (P.E.) | Iowa (P.E.) |
| Kansas (P.E.) | Kentucky (P.E.) | Louisiana (P.E.) |
| Maine (P.E.) | Maryland (P.E.) | Michigan (P.E.) |
| Minnesota (P.E.) | Mississippi (P.E.) | Missouri (P.E.) |
| Montana (P.E.) | Nebraska (P.E.) | Nevada (P.E.) |
| New Hampshire (P.E.) | New Jersey (P.E.) | New Mexico (P.E.) |
| New York (P.E.) | North Carolina (P.E.) | North Dakota (P.E.) |
| Ohio (P.E. Timed & Monitored) | Oklahoma (P.E.) | Oregon (P.E.) |
| Pennsylvania (P.E.) | South Carolina (P.E.) | South Dakota (P.E.) |
| Tennessee (P.E.) | Texas (P.E.) | Utah (P.E.) |
| Vermont (P.E.) | Virginia (P.E.) | West Virginia (P.E.) |
| Wisconsin (P.E.) | Wyoming (P.E.) | |
To meet the Ohio Board's intent that online courses be "paced" by the provider, a timer will be used to record your study time. You will be unable to access the quiz until the required study time of 100 minutes has been met.
Credit: 2 PDH
Length: 49 pages
