Lawrence Carson |
There are a couple of typos on page 4 of the pdf:
"Therefore ∆P ML-1T2 is dimensionless" should read;
"Therefore ∆P M-1LT2 is dimensionless"
and;
"π3 = µ (pd3)-1(d) (dv-1)2" should read;"π3 = µ (pd3)-1(d) (dv-1)"
Superscripts omitted. WEBMASTER NOTE: Thanks for pointing out the editing error. The author has made corrections as required.
Anne Parry |
There were some typos in the material. Also, I would like some examples of the relevance of the dimensional analysis. WEBMASTER NOTE: A review of this course has been requested to address this.
Paramjit Chibber |
The course material was really good.
Lisa Chavel |
The font in some of the graphs and tables was a bit hard to read. WEBMASTER COMMENT: Thank you for your comment. The course was sent to our Review Team for their feedback, it has been concluded that no changes are required at this time.
John Gerstenlauer |
Course document had numerous errors with misidentified variables, spelling, etc., and was not structured very well.
Webmaster response: Thanks for your comments. Per our email communication, we have asked our Review Team to verify the equations and possible grammatical issues. A revised version of the course with any required changes will be made available to you.
Anthony Crews |
Good overview of hydraulic enigneering
Jana Rush |
I understand the fluid equations alot better now
Ian Cranston |
The course material itself is fine, and was a good overview
Kolton Christensen |
There were several typos throughout course. WEBMASTER NOTE: Thank you for your comments. The course was sent to our Review Team for their comments and has been updated accordingly.
PHILIP PUCEL |
This course attempted to cover many topics, some of which need more detailed discussion and clarifications. Some symbols were used for 2 different dimensions; and there were typographical errors in some of the solutions to example problems. The discussion on Dimensional Analysis was difficult to follow and there weren't adequate examples to show the usefulness of this mathematical tool. Perhaps this one abstract mathematical topic deserves a separate course with much more detailed explanations.
Some topics were introduced with little or no introductory discussion.
Most of the example problems were applicable to the topics and were valuable in aiding understanding of the concepts.
