Donald Norris |
Very comprehensive course

Stephen Powell |
Confusing and poorly documented.

John Peckham |
Not really innovative or interesting.

Michael Herbert |

Johnny Keeton |

Robert Clay |

christopher hamon |

Jack Hembree |

Jeffrey Flanders |

Terje Borge Svensen |
Nothing new, unique or revolutionary about this VIPeR approach, other than putting a new name on something old, emphasize putting data in a organized table, and scaling the numbers to make it easy for someone to easily carry out the computations in their head, and calling it something new. Overall a disappointment.

WILLIAM URQUHART |
Complicates straight forward concepts unnecessarily.

Very disappointed.

Richard Wargo |

Annette Malekandrasians |

Peter Leptuch |
This course took about twice as long as expected.

Edwin Storer |

Ryan Lange |
The material was not very well written and confusing at times. If one did not already have a handle on 3-phase systems, I don't believe this course would have helped understanding.

Randall Chavez |
Extremely difficult if Electrical engineering is not your area of expertise

Tim McLellan |
Questions 14 and 15 are the same question.WEBMASTER NOTE: Thank you for your comments. We've asked our Review Team to make an editorial review of this course document. If changes are made during the review, a revised course document will be available.

Daniel Stelly |

Mark Tatum |

Steve Silberstein |
Very practical course

Patrick Morrill |
Good course.

michael austin |
Good background.

William Fullerton |
A section on vector algebra would have been useful.

Brian Apple |
Way too math-intensive. Good lesson but felt like I was back in college.

RICHARD WUNDERLEY |

Ryan Wanko |
Pretty good.

Robert Murray |
Good course.

Thomas Richter |
As a mechanical engineer, was not that fun.

William Meiners |
Very helpful in helping to understand the different concepts of 3 phase power.