Todd Presson |
Interesting, thoughtful and well-researched presentation on the importance of engaging with the public on controversial projects. Technology and social media has made this even more important today; ignore it at your peril.
RAYMOND JORDAN |
I believe the author is pedantic and overly verbose.
Jeff OGorman |
very dense, academic material.
Jacob Vieck |
This was a slog. Difficult to read and follow. I feel like the author was more concerned with coming off as "sounding smart" rather than presenting good information. The information is there...but it's not presented well.
David Dye |
Superb refresher. Also provides new context and framework for public engagement on complex projects.
Anthony Ciolfi |
A lot of information to comprehend. could use more real life explanations at a local level where most engineering conflicts arise. and how to apply the techniques.
James Bouford |
Beginning of the course, first three chapters, are more of a master's thesis than a course. References distracted from the message.
Sanjaya Perera |
More of a literature review than a course.
Lynn Kaerwer |
This is a good course with an interesting perspective and tools. The vocabulary level is advanced, which may put off some participants.
James Davison |
This directly applies to my job. Technical skills and people skills are a powerful combination.
John MIttleman |
Excellent presentation of the theoretical underpinnings of technical communication. I just recently took the Ethics course that dealt with the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, and now clearly see where technical communications fell apart, predictably.
David Whitaker |
This will be very helpful in both my professional work and in my personal life.
Robert Ablondi |
Help topics covered that affect many environmental issues
Timothy Steward |
Good course content, very worthwhile. It did have a significant amount of grammatical/spelling errors scattered throughout the course.