WILLIAM BISCEGLIA | 503 reviews
Peter Allaben | 503 reviews
Shannon Winnie | 503 reviews
great information to contemplate
charles miller | 503 reviews
brian conroy | 503 reviews
Laura Blanchard | 503 reviews
H Chang | 503 reviews
Good course with interactive slide deck.
David Amato | 503 reviews
Jean Pierre Beaudouin | 503 reviews
enjoyed to read the recognition moral obligation of the engineer.
Hung Quach | 503 reviews
Easy to follow.
Maher Mike Sidani | 503 reviews
John | 503 reviews
Good information but dry. As an engineer, none of us enjoy reading about legal liability.
Dean Howard | 503 reviews
Alex Petrin | 503 reviews
I think a few more case studies could be helpful in addition to the excavation trench box example cited throughout. Additionally, the course proposes discussion questions at the end. While these do encourage some though on the part of the participant, I don't know if they are as useful in this course setting (eg- more appropriate for group or in person course).
Joseph Ucciferro | 503 reviews
emanuel vasilescu | 503 reviews
Christopher Sclafani | 503 reviews
Matt Brown | 503 reviews
Franklin Rutledge | 503 reviews
Literature was very redundant.
Jesse Horsford | 503 reviews
Michael McKain | 503 reviews
John Longnaker | 503 reviews
Good course on how we as engineers need to think safety first.
Katherine Vavala | 503 reviews
This was interesting and well presented.
Douglas Sutton | 503 reviews
Mark Ottemiller | 503 reviews
Von Pilcher | 503 reviews
Interesting
James Henry | 503 reviews
Brian Olsen | 503 reviews
Good topic and well explored. Brought up good ideas and sited good references. Would recommend to another.
Raymond Gottlieb | 503 reviews
Glenn Amore | 503 reviews
It's apparent to me that the author has no real-life experience with engineering and is using trenches as a "straw man" for the basis of his position. Contractors have the responsibility of maintaining the safety of their jobsite using OSHA as their basis. For larger projects there are OSHA engineers on a project. The world of engineering and construction is vast. Nobody knows everything about everything and every code. It's not practical or reasonable. There's not enough time or fee on a project to know all issues on a project. It takes a team of professionals to bring a project safely to life. To insinuate the Challenger engineers knew what the problem was before the launch is ridiculous. Space exploration was and is still new. There are hundreds of thousands of details involved in the design of the shuttle. I have a friend that was a shuttle engineer and he will tell you that any engineer would pull the plug on the launch if they had reason to believe a system failure could occur. The Challenger was a horrible accident and I know how horrible these engineers felt after the accident. I am amazed that they could determine the cause of the accident.