Luke Weber |
Material was generally interesting and well presented. Didn't have that classic "conflict of interest" element I have come to expect.
Jon Austin |
Interesting article. Clearly demonstrates that you should never assume someone has reviewed a design detail without verification.
Kimberly Smith |
The course was very informative, but wish it would have been provided by a live instructor. It was nice that it really delved into all of the parties and issues at hand. There were multiple parties at fault. Electronically had issues w/ viewing video links and needed to re-login quite a few times to complete the course. Overall the course was well written and easy to follow.
ANIL KHURANA |
Course is very good and a great learning.
Greg Chandler |
Very thought provoking on how attention to even the smallest assumptions can cause a major impact.
Kory Anderson |
Very interesting as I was a student at the nearby University of Minnesota and had drove across that bridge several times.
Damon Becher |
Decent review of the factors contributing to this disaster.
Cynthia Jonas |
Visuals and annotations are small for reviewing on a tablet. Suggest using a PC with a full sized monitor.
Roberta Langenfeld |
A thorough analysis of the root causes and contributing factors, both human and physical.
Trent Wickman |
convenient and interesting
Seth Hueckman |
Well done, easy to follow and a good comprehensive overview of the bridge collapse.
James Thompson III |
Interesting and thorough!
Jeff Sowers |
Interesting course and excellent example for engineering ethics and safety. Somewhat redundant. Some sound other than one short external video clip would be an improvement.
Ronald Ehresmann |
very informative and helpful
William Neuhauser |
Sound would have been nice.