Stephen Manifold |
A bit too wordy in places. Too much filler material.
james Mooney |
It was a good course. Helped to clarify some questions I had about the analysis process.
Philip McDonald |
A comprehensive and easy to understand overview.
William Swain |
Well written current state of CFD in the various engineering market sectors and the associated challenges and benefits.
Stephen Deduck |
I liked the course and felt I got some insight into CFD, but the range and depth of the subject can be daunting, but then again the possibilities are endless. Maybe that is the best lesson of all?
Anthony Dall |
The course covered the topics as mentioned in the course description.
Jesper Andersen |
Excellent discussion of the CFD method.
Al Schiazza |
COurse should go into more depth.
Howard Baldeosingh |
Too many examples that don't really teach much on the subject.
Joel Harris |
This is a good review of CFD technology. I do wish that it had the published date available. I believe there are some updates in the technology since this was published.
Lawrence OConnell |
Good material but I don't see a publish date, so I am concerned about how current the information is, especially on industry applications, CAD integration etc.
Mike Jansen |
Good overview. A bit too Chemical Processing centered.
Mark Wallace |
I'm not going to be able to run a CFD program from this, but it provided some information on what equations are used by some CFD programs. It also brings up many examples of how CFD can be used in various industries.
Jennifer Melendez |
Very informative and provides a great understanding of CFD process and applications.
Mark Hemingway |
very challenging material in parts
Timothy Dake |
I took a number of courses on CFD in college but this one did an excellent job of distilling the material down to the really necessary to know information.