Tony Cooley |
well written and shows experience with this work. I would have combined the drawings of the site so the local site included a topo. The broader topo should have had the distance cirles.
Alan |
The course is very useful in understanding wide aspects of a consulting project: Overall procedures regarding projects.
Chris Renoud |
Interesting and Informative
Robert Kirkbright |
Course provides a clear, concise summary of a RAD/HW site investigation.
Michael McAnally |
A bit more analysis would be excited. A reasonable training though.
Brian Peake |
On page 6, under the Hazardous Chemical Waste paragraph heading, reference is made to 10 CFR Part 40 being the governing regulation for disposal of hazardous and chemical waste. This is incorrect. Please correct the citation and also fix the associated quiz question. These courses are expensive and I would expect material to be correct. WEBMASTER COMMENT: We have referred your comment to the course author, who states, "I now had the opportunity to review the text on page 6 and test questions 3 & 4 of Part 1-History Leading to Contract Award. The text on page 6 does not contain the word "governing" and the meaning is absolutely clear as written." We appreciate your comments; however the author feels that the choice of the word "governing" is correct in this instance.
Bryan Levesque |
Really interesting background on general setup of these programs...looking forward to part 2 of the series.
David Horne |
Course was easy to understand, but would have appreciated more technical information of the project discussed.
Krystle McClain |
Great real life application and overview of the tasks and coordination involved for remediation of environmental hazardous sites.
Lori Miller |
The material was clear and organized; less of a text-based presentation and more photos and graphics would have made the material more readable.